When a regulator, an employee, or a court asks what happened, you have something to hand over. Each scan becomes one record with consent, purpose, and timestamp.
Issued by Clavira on behalf of Pioneer Air · O'Hare Terminal 1
Receipt #R-2026-04-3019-7
You were scanned.
This receipt records what happened, when, and under what consent. Verify at clavira.com/verify/R-2026-04-3019-7.
Knowledge and Transparency. Connected.
Four capabilities snap onto your existing biometric stack and quietly turn raw scans into defensible records.
The path to evidence
The mechanism is short. The output is what counts.
Stage 1
The scan happens. Consent, purpose, timestamp, and jurisdiction are sealed at the moment of capture.
Stage 2
Issued by Clavira on behalf of Vantage Logistics · Warehouse 12
Receipt #R-2026-04-3019-8
You were scanned.
This receipt records what happened, when, and under what consent. Verify at clavira.com/verify/R-2026-04-3019-8.
The capture becomes a receipt the subject can read and a third party can verify.
Stage 3
Receipts compile into an export the court accepts. CSV, JSON, and PDF, with cryptographic verification built in.
Coverage
Four statutes, four kinds of evidence the receipt produces.
Law
Evidence Produced
BIPA
Illinois · 740 ILCS 14/15(a)(b)
Consent + retention evidence
Consent + retention evidence
CUBI
Texas · Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §503.001(b)
Notice + consent evidence
Notice + consent evidence
Biometric Identifiers Act
Washington · RCW 19.375.020
Pre-enrollment authorization
Pre-enrollment authorization
Privacy Act
Colorado · §6-1-1314 (per HB 24-1130)
Purpose-at-capture + retention
Purpose-at-capture + retention
On the horizon
The architecture is built for the next ones: Massachusetts, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania.
Comprehensive state privacy laws with biometric provisions (CA, CT, VA, OR, DE, MD, MN, and others) share the same evidentiary pipeline. Current as of June 2026.
The standard
Receipts are written to the BES-1 schema and produce foundation-ready evidence under FRE 901(b)(9) and state evidentiary equivalents.
BES-1 is the open schema for biometric event attestations. FRE 901(b)(9) governs evidence of a process or system that produces an accurate result.
Every receipt opens with two words to the person scanned. "You were scanned." That is the principle Clavira was built on.
Early access
Join the early-access list. We'll share the BES-1 spec, the integration path, and how Clavira's receipt fits the biometric stack you already run.
We email about Clavira's product and compliance updates. Unsubscribe any time.
Evidence from the record
What the courts have decided.
Three numbers from the public record — why biometric evidence is now a board-level exposure, not a paperwork problem.
Damages posture
$0B
BIPA's per-scan damages ceiling
The Illinois Supreme Court held that each biometric scan is a separate violation under BIPA §15(b). Statutory damages against the class size yielded a maximum potential exposure of roughly $17 billion — a ceiling, not an awarded amount.
Cothron v. White Castle
2023 IL 128004
Settlement scale
$0B
Largest single-state biometric settlement
Meta settled with Texas under CUBI for $1.4 billion in July 2024 — the largest privacy settlement ever paid by one company to a single U.S. state.
Texas v. Meta
CUBI · Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §503.001
Regulatory footprint
0
States with dedicated biometric statutes
3 in force — Illinois (BIPA), Texas (CUBI), Washington (Ch. 19.375 RCW). 6 pending in 2025-2026 sessions: MA, MO, MN, NE, NY, PA. Broad state privacy laws with biometric provisions are not counted here.
State Legislatures
Current as of June 2026
Figures cited from public court records and statute. Not legal advice.